Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 02:47

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Andrew Tate or Nas Daily, who do you prefer more?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ford recalls 1M vehicles over backup camera glitch - MLive.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Mysterious fast radio burst turns out to be from long-dead NASA satellite - Phys.org
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What the Texas food label law means for the rest of America - The Washington Post
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
India to Open Flagship EV Making Policy to Lure Global Giants - Bloomberg
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
No Man's Sky Gets A Massive Switch 2 Upgrade And It's All Free - Kotaku
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
First-ever airborne toxin detected in Western Hemisphere - Phys.org
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Big Bang May Not Be The Beginning of Everything, New Theory Suggests - ScienceAlert
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?